WARNING this is a huge extremely angsty, possibly offensive rant, so if you’re sensitive or hold very conservative views about sexuality and sex education I reckon now’s a good time to get out of here because you won’t like what you’re read. This is doubly important if you’re one of my parents (quit being so nosy Dad!) because I KNOW this will offend you. Plus because I am very annoyed about the subject matter of my rant I will probably be quite incoherent, so maybe those of you who can’t handle that should get lost as well.
Now that that’s over and done with, lets get on to the matter at hand.
The reason why I’m so angry today (not that I am very much less angry on any other day) is because I happened to get a suggestion from a fellow PRCS alumnus that I peek at our former school’s website and have a quick look at whether any of the teaching staff who taught us back in the day were still there or not. Many of them were, but that is not why I am so incensed.
My anger comes from having clicked through to a page that described the hooey-patooey that passes for “sexual education” in my former school. Now, it’s not like I had the best of sex-ed teachers when I was there. They had the tendency to give us the “sex will give you AIDS and you’ll die” and “you’re body is a temple” speeches without much real information aside from just don’t have sex or rushed through sex-ed because they weren’t comfortable with talking about the down and dirty with giggly 13 year old kids, which wasn’t IMHO very useful at all for a teenager with hormones going all over the place.
No. My anger doesn’t derive from the fact that it has gotten worse than what it was, but rather that it has not gotten any better. In particular, what incensed me the most of all and left me fuming was the fact that the page stated very clearly that:
(Sexuality education) is premised upon the importance of the heterosexual married family as the basic unit of society, and respect for the values and beliefs of the difference ethnic and religious communities on sexuality issues
While I do understand the importance of teaching young Singaporeans tact and to be sensitive and respectful towards the views of ours, I do NOT condone teaching teenagers who are grappling with figuring out their sexual identity that having anything less than a heterosexual married family is basically failing to engage and contribute as a useful, productive “basic unit” of society. Neither do I condone the following things which are also listed in this year’s plan for sexuality education in PRCS:
- Understand that certain public display of affection is not considered proper behaviour in our society
- Recognise that break-ups may happen in relationships and that one can break up without hurting others.
Hell, I’m nearing my mid-20s and have yet to have had a past relationship in which the break up didn’t hurt. I’ve even been in situations where just saying no to a potential relationship has hurt someone. Not hurting anyone at all in any situation? Idealistic. And I find it absolutely ridiculous that anyone can claim to be able to teach you how to do that. If you can, kindly contact me because I’d like a lesson and then the opportunity to laugh at how naive you are. Relationships are complicated children, trust me the adults that teach you probably are just as befuddled as you are.
Also, since when has holding hands or kissing in public suddenly become illegal in Singapore? Many young Singaporeans that I know who are near and dear to me not only engage in PDA but would consider you strange if you didn’t! I’m not talking about anything indecent here, and perhaps I should give the school the benefit of the doubt as they did not define what PDA was. But a little healthy lip-lock and hand-holding I find nothing to get your panties in a bunch about. People need to seriously lighten up.
To give PRCS some credit though, there appears to be a greater emphasis on contraception (YAY) especially on use of condoms, which I think many an adult could use a good refresher on also. The risk of STIs is also featured now for all students, not just the biology students, a group which I happened to belong to in my time there. And also, which I thought was very surprising, the option for parents to opt out of ALL aspects of the sexuality education for their child.
The latter can obviously swing both ways. Whilst I would rather sit my child down have a frank discussion about sex, their options and the importance of contraception and try to establish a relationship where they CAN talk to me about their concerns regarding sex and sexuality, I can see how some uber religious parents may choose to opt their children out of sexuality education for fear that they may get funny ideas about having sex and also how to “avoid getting pregnant” (which for the life of me I can’t see as being a bad thing at a teenager’s stage in life) rather than just avoiding having sex. However, seeing as we didn’t have that option in the past it is nice to know that now students do not have to be subjected to the conservative government approved sexuality education should they have liberal parents who’d gladly take sexuality education as their own task. I guess you really shouldn’t nanny parents too much anyway, and teens have their ways and means of finding out about things that their parents may be reluctant to talk to them about.
But returning to the “heterosexual married family” issue. What bothered me so much about this was the fact that the GLBT society is once again being dismissed as unproductive and possibly threatening to the very fabric of Singapore’s oh-so-sensitive soviety and also that those who are unmarried (single mothers for example) as also implicitly being dismissed as not a “real” family unit. Excuse me for saying so, but the last time I checked heterosexual married families can be classed just as often as “unhealthy relationships”, another overused term that the document bangs on about. And also, I don’t see how children from either homosexual parents or from single-parent homes are any less likely to be as successful and or to turn out as balanced as children produced in heterosexual marriages.
The idea that the sexuality or the marital status of one’s parent/s can have any bearing on an individual child may turn out in the future, given the same input of love and affection and encouragement, is so absurd to me. And before you get any ideas, no I am not part of the GLBT society myself. I just happen to be a well-balanced, non-judgemental, non-idiotic (debatable) heterosexual, who was raised in Singapore, who sees that there is no point in trying to discredit anyone’s contributions to the society they live in or to consider them less of a “basic unit” of society based on who they are attracted to sexually or whether they chose NOT to marry a dead-beat, abusive partner and still raise children. How is someone who choses not to subject their future child to verbal or physical abuse or a just an unhappy marriage, less admirable and less valuable an individual than someone who stays in a bad marriage for the wrong reasons? And how is a healthy well-balanced, kind, generous and well-educated man who happens to be attracted to men less valuable an individual who are all those things but heterosexual?
Are their tax dollars less valuable than other people’s tax dollars? Are their votes less valuable than votes cast by heterosexual married couple’s? Would their love and affection be lesser than the love and affection of a heterosexual couple’s for their child/ren? In my heart and mind the answer to all those questions is a resounding “No”. How are they less of a basic unit to society? I thought the basic unit to society was PEOPLE, are they trying to suggest that a GLBT person or a single mother is less of a person than a married heterosexual individual?
I just see so much danger in teaching a child that may be suspecting that they are “different” sexually, and actually struggling with it, that they are a failure because they aren’t heterosexual and that they should conform to the perceived norm. It makes for an even more turbulent and troubled teenage life than that of the average teen. And also for courageous single parents of the future, plants that little seed of self-doubt in their head, no doubt reinforced by the laws in Singapore that do not support single parents, specifically mothers, and provide them aid, financial or otherwise. These parents have greater burdens for child-rearing on their shoulders, surely we shouldn’t be adding to that by making them feel that they are somehow inadequate because they lack a partner?
In fact, now that I think about it, the document also excludes heterosexual UNmarried couples. What is so wrong with those? Do we all really need to stand on roofs and shout our love out to the world? Why do our relationships have to be approved by society for them to be considered “real”. Why is a mutual sexual and romantic relationship to which one commits long term less of a valubale relationship to society, or why should it be perceived as such, compared to that of someone who HAS to have their relationship approved before the eyes of society? How does any of that make any sense?
I guess in part I am also disappointed that things have changed so little in Singapore’s sexuality education. I had thought that things would have been less exclusion towards the minority and better understanding and empathy for the GLBT members and single parents of society. I had thought, surely being kind-hearted would be something they would teach children rather than the disdain and contempt they seem to be planting in their hearts for those who just don’t “fit in”.
What is there really that I can do besides rant? I’m lucky to be in Europe, and lucky to have wonderfully intelligent and kind people who are proudly and openly gay, as well as brave single mothers to their children. If you happen to be part of one of those groups in Singapore, take heart, the rest of the world don’t hate you and plenty of Singaporeans who are of my age group will probably be educated enough to see you for the person that you are, and recognize that you are in every way equal to everyone else as a person. Do not let those ugly conservatives get you down, you are the best you that you can be and just as wonderful as you can be as well.
And on that slightly embarassingly mushy note, I take myself to bed before this gets out of hand. Goodnight, and remember everyone you are special regardless of who you choose or choose not to fuck.